- 1366X768 GRID AUTOSPORT IMAGES 1080P
- 1366X768 GRID AUTOSPORT IMAGES DRIVERS
- 1366X768 GRID AUTOSPORT IMAGES DRIVER
- 1366X768 GRID AUTOSPORT IMAGES FULL
1366X768 GRID AUTOSPORT IMAGES DRIVER
This particular graph comes from early in the test, from the point where the race begins, and our automated driver trails a good chunk of the pack the whole time. The benchmark runs longer than 60 seconds, but our test only grabs the first 60 seconds of the run.
1366X768 GRID AUTOSPORT IMAGES 1080P
We're concerned with whether Iris Plus can give us solid frame rates throughout the length of a test run.įirst we'll look at GRID Autosport, which we tested with the same 1080p resolution and High graphical settings as we had above. This isn't a comparative analysis at this point we're not concerned with which system does a better job of keeping the frame times down. To dig in depth, we used frame time capture tool CapFrameX to grab 60 seconds of frame times. To get a good feel for this, we sampled a couple of games we already looked at previously with this system: GRID Autosport from our tests above and the Hitman reboot from 2016, which we looked at in the preview.
1366X768 GRID AUTOSPORT IMAGES DRIVERS
Since we're looking at a new graphics architecture, it only makes sense to see how far along the drivers are. GRID Autosport and Hitman (2016) Performance Over Time That's fine, but we still want to take a closer look at gaming performance. Intel's new graphics architecture represents an improvement over the last, but it's not magic. Both of these games got the best mix of performance and visual quality out of their medium settings at 1920x1200, or by dropping the resolution to 1440x900 and cranking up the detail.
1366X768 GRID AUTOSPORT IMAGES FULL
We found that you could have maximum detail or a full 1920x1200 resolution and get playable framerates, but you couldn't really have both at once. We spent some time going HAM in Fornite and Dota 2 to get a feel for how some of the most popular esports titles fared. Subjectively, Iris Plus's graphics performance was really solid, too. As before, the only systems which scored faster than the are those with discrete graphics solutions. In fact, the Iris Plus's minimum 43 frames per second matches the average frame rate of the Ryzen 5 2500U's Vega 8 graphics, which is quite a feat. We've gone from borderline-unplayable performance at 1080p to a quite smooth framerate in a generation. We tested at 1080p with the High image quality preset.Īgain, Iris Plus came awfully close to doubling up the performance of Intel's UHD 620 integrated graphics. Codemasters also promotes that GRID Autosport is "optimized for integrated Intel HD Graphics", which is certainly something. Codemasters also tuned its graphics engine to perform well over a wide variety of mainstream systems, which makes it a great test for systems with integrated graphics. The third GRID game is built on Codemasters' EGO engine that boasts more realistic physics and damage systems to add a bit of danger and some extra realism to the racing. Codemasters set out to improve GRID Autosport's handling and environment rendering to make it a true racing simulator.
The developer wanted to make up for GRID 2, which released to mediocre reviews from critics and gamerse alike. GRID Autosport is a cross-platform racing simulation developed by Codemasters. It's unfortunate that we don't have any Vega 8 scores to compare to, but several results in the 3DMark database indicate that AMD's solution would score around 8000 points, so we think Intel would have won that fight, too. That's incredibly impressive for any integrated graphics solution. In this test, the Iris Plus graphics solution trails the MX 150 by around 13 percentage points, and exceeds the UHD 620 IGP in the ThinkPad by 73%. Night Raid focuses on integrated graphics performance but uses the low-level DirectX 12 API to do so.
0 kommentar(er)
